IN()子句中的子查询导致错误
问题描述:
我在SQL Server 2005上,并且遇到了一个我非常确定不应该得到的错误。IN()子句中的子查询导致错误
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Procedure spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser, Line 8 Subquery
returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery
follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
我下面就 this MSDN链接的例子·B。
我存储的proc代码如下。如果您要求这样我就可以把它简化为这篇文章的缘故:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser]
@strUserName varchar(50)
,@bitQuickSearch bit = 0
AS
BEGIN
SELECT [intSearchID] ,strSearchTypeCode ,[strSearchName]
FROM [tblAdminSearches]
WHERE
strUserName = @strUserName
AND
strSearchTypeCode
IN (
CASE @bitQuickSearch
WHEN 1 THEN 'Quick'
ELSE (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes)
END
)
ORDER BY strSearchName
END
我已签有来自子查询结果集和strSearchTypeCode子查询结果相比较之间没有数据类型不匹配。
我看不出为什么这不应该工作。如果你有任何线索,请让我知道。
答
尝试重新排列查询,以便布尔表达式在子查询内发生,例如,
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetSavedSearchesByAdminUser]
@strUserName varchar(50)
,@bitQuickSearch bit = 0
AS
BEGIN
SELECT [intSearchID] ,strSearchTypeCode ,[strSearchName]
FROM [tblAdminSearches]
WHERE
strUserName = @strUserName
AND
strSearchTypeCode
IN (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes where @bitQuickSearch=0
UNION
SELECT 'Quick' AS strSearchTypeCode WHERE @bitQuickSearch=1)
ORDER BY strSearchName
END
答
我不知道你可以像这样在IN子句中使用CASE语句。我建议重写该位:
WHERE strUserName = @strUserName AND (
(@bitQuickSearch = 1 AND strSearchTypeCode = 'Quick')
OR
(strSearchTypeCode IN (SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes))
)
或者,如果你真的喜欢的风格你到了那里:
WHERE strUserName = @strUserName
AND strSearchTypeCode IN (
SELECT CASE @bitQuickSearch WHEN 1 THEN 'Quick' ELSE strSearchTypeCode END
FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes
)
一般情况下,SQL应该是明智的足够聪明,优化掉的表如果@bitQuickSearch = 1。但是,我会检查查询计划,以确保(信任,但验证)。
答
在我看来,这个选择:
SELECT strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes
返回多行,那是你的问题。您可以将其重写为:
SELECT TOP 1 strSearchTypeCode FROM tblAdvanceSearchTypes
我会做一个联盟所有,因为即使你有愚蠢,它在IN子句中并不重要。 – 2008-10-02 16:47:05