在Lithium/Freemarker中删除重复项目
问题描述:
我正在使用Lithium自定义组件创建撰写了大多数博客文章的用户列表。我有一个写过博客文章的用户列表,然后通过休息电话来获取每个用户编写的博客文章的数量。在Lithium/Freemarker中删除重复项目
<#assign authors = rest("blogs/id/audiofile/posts")>
<#list authors.node_message_context.message.author as t>
<#assign count = rest("${[email protected]}/posts/style/blog/count")>
<#assign orderedCount = count.value>
<#list orderedCount as c>
<ul>
<li>Blog posts ${c} userid ${[email protected]}
</ul>
</#list>
</#list>
给出
Blog posts 4 userid /users/id/2477
Blog posts 4 userid /users/id/2477
Blog posts 4 userid /users/id/2477
我的问题的输出如何删除此列表中的重复的作者吗?
答
的FAQ文章 http://freemarker.org/docs/app_faq.html#faq_modify_seq_and_map 概述为什么这是棘手的。基本上,它要求修改您的RESTful接口做的工作适合你:
<#assign authors = rest("blogs/id/audiofile/uniquauthors")>
将是一个新的RESTful接口的例子,然后工作是在服务器端完成。
答
@Wolfgang Fahl希望我们可以修改Lithium REST API =)!
不幸的是,这是不是这样的,所以我们必须对付我们得到什么,也可以做这样的事情:
<#-- this variable we need to store unique author ids -->
<#assign authorids = [] />
<#-- I'd use API v2 here, think for such stuff it's more powerful than v1 -->
<#assign query = 'SELECT author FROM messages WHERE conversation.style = "blog" AND board.id = "audiofiles"'?url />
<#assign response = rest("2.0", "https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=" + query) />
<#-- the response object will contain a list of blog post authors,
we loop trough them to get uniqe ids of every user that has written
a blog post, we need them later -->
<#list response.data.items as author>
<#-- make sure each author just gets added once -->
<#if !authorids?seq_contains(author.id)>
<#assign authorids = authorids + [author.id] />
</#if>
</#list>
<#-- now we loop trough the unique author ids and ask for the amount of
blog posts they have written -->
<ul>
<#list authorids as id>
<#assign query = 'SELECT count(*) FROM messages WHERE author.id = id AND board.id = "audiofiles"'?url />
<#assign response = rest("2.0", "https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=" + query) />
<li>User with ID ${id} has written ${response.data.count} blog posts</li>
</#list>
</ul>
代码是未经测试,所以不是100%肯定,如果它的工作原理,但我希望我选择的方法通过上面的代码变得清晰...