oracle备份及备份策略_基本的非基于云的个人备份策略
oracle备份及备份策略
Here's the summary if you feel the rest of this post is TL;DR and a ramble, which is likely because it is.
如果您觉得本文的其余部分是TL; DR和一个混乱的情况，则为以下摘要，这很可能是因为。
-
Use an imaging tool like Acronis True Image to create images of the machines you REALLY care about.
使用诸如Acronis True Image之类的映像工具来创建您真正关心的机器的映像。
- You can also use the System Image tool built into Windows, but I prefer the additional options from Acronis. 您也可以使用Windows内置的系统映像工具，但我更喜欢Acronis的其他选项。
Use an imaging tool like Acronis True Image to create images of the machines you REALLY care about.
使用Acronis True Image之类的映像工具来创建您真正关心的机器的映像。
-
Encrypt your external drives.
加密您的外部驱动器。
-
Backup files (and disk images) to two external drives
将文件(和磁盘映像)备份到两个外部驱动器
-
Keep one external drive off-site
将一个外部驱动器保持在异地
-
Test your backups by practicing a restore. The rule of thumb is that backups ALWAYS succeed. It's restores that fail!
通过执行还原来测试您的备份。 经验法则是，备份始终会成功。 还原失败！
I've been experimenting with cloud-based backup trying nearly everything out there from KeepVault to CrashPlan. I'm currently "between online backup strategies" right now, although I'm leaning towards CrashPlan. Most of these online backup companies are pretty confusing when you factor in someone with a server. For example, I have a main computer in my house but I also have a server. I have a KitchenPC and my wife's laptop but both of those don't matter as all the data is on server. However, I really want disk images for my main machine.
我一直在尝试基于云的备份，几乎尝试了从KeepVault到CrashPlan的所有内容。 我目前正在“在线备份策略之间”，尽管我倾向于CrashPlan 。 当您考虑使用服务器的人时，这些在线备份公司中的大多数都非常混乱。 例如，我家中有一台主计算机，但也有一台服务器。 我有一台KitchenPC和我妻子的笔记本电脑，但这两个都没关系，因为所有数据都在服务器上。 但是，我确实想要我的主机的磁盘映像。
I need two things:
我需要两件事：
- Continuous reliable image backup 连续可靠的映像备份
- My server's files backed up 我服务器的文件已备份
The whole point here being if a natural disaster happens no family videos or photos will be lost. For folks that keep all their files on their local PCs and not a server, any of these online services is great. However, as soon as I centralized my files, things got more complex. KeepVault is the best for Windows Home Server users as it has a custom Home Server client that integrates to the WHS control panel directly.
这里的全部要点是，如果发生自然灾害，不会丢失任何家庭视频或照片。 对于将所有文件都保存在本地PC而不是服务器上的人们来说，这些在线服务中的任何一个都很棒。 但是，一旦我对文件进行集中管理，事情就会变得更加复杂。 KeepVault具有Windows Home Server用户的最佳选择，因为它具有可直接集成到WHS控制面板的自定义Home Server客户端。
Now that I've moved over to a Linux-solution like Synology, other than using straight rsync or rsync to S3, the best solution appears to be CrashPlan Headless. While it's not directly supported on the Synology, there are LOTS of people who want to make this work so I wouldn't be totally alone, although the instructions are daunting and insane to say the least.
现在，除了使用直接rsync或rsync到S3之外，我已经转到Synology等Linux解决方案，最好的解决方案似乎是CrashPlan Headless 。 尽管Synology上没有直接支持它，但仍有很多人想做这项工作，所以我不会完全孤单，尽管至少可以说这些指示令人生畏和疯狂。
At this point, today, I've got a 4TB SAN with about 1.5TB on it and no cloud storage. And honestly, I wasn't looking forward to waiting two weeks (or longer) to upload 1.5TB to a new service, and I'm not sure what my ISP would say about it. I think that initial seed of large datasets is the Achilles Heel of online backup.
到目前为止，今天，我已经有了一个4TB SAN，上面有大约1.5TB ，没有云存储。 老实说，我不希望等待两周(或更长时间)将1.5TB上载到新服务，而且我不确定ISP会怎么说。 我认为大型数据集的最初种子是在线备份的致命弱点。
I really don't feel comfortable with my backups unless they are offsite. So I went and bought two Western Digital My Passport Essential SE 1 TB USB 3.0 Drives and labeled them Backup A and Backup B.
除非备份不在现场，否则我真的对备份不满意。 因此，我去买了两个Western Digital My Passport Essential SE 1 TB USB 3.0驱动器，并分别标记为备份A和备份B。
I recommend that you encrypt the whole disk. The last thing you want when you're copying your entire life onto one drive is to do it in the great wide open. There's two good ways to do it, BitLocker To Go or TrueCrypt.
我建议您加密整个磁盘。 将一生复制到一个驱动器上时，您想要做的最后一件事就是大开阔地进行操作。 有两种很好的方法可以做到这一点： BitLocker To Go或TrueCrypt 。
-
BitLocker To Go is in Windows 7 Enterprise or Ultimate. It's trivially easy to use and you CAN read BitLocker To Go'ed disks on any Windows7 Edition, or even on Windows XP or Windows Vista with BitLocker To Go Reader. It supports TPMs if your laptop has that feature and it's super secure.
BitLocker To Go在Windows 7 Enterprise或Ultimate中。 它非常容易使用，您可以在任何Windows7 Edition或什至在Windows XP或Windows Vista上使用BitLocker To Go Reader读取BitLocker To Go'ed磁盘。 如果您的笔记本电脑具有TPM，则它支持TPM，并且超级安全。
-
TrueCrypt is open source and super hardcore. There's dozens of really amazing options for things like plausible deniability, honey pot secret partitions, and many choices of encryption. It's also crazy secure.
TrueCrypt是开源和超级硬核。 对于合理的可拒绝性，蜜罐秘密分区以及多种加密选择，有数十种真正令人惊奇的选择。 这也是疯狂的安全。
You really can't go wrong with either of these choices. For testing, I'm trying each of them, one on each drive. I like TrueCrypt, though because it's open source, but I like that BitLocker is built-in to Windows. We'll see. Point is, don't put your life on a disk unencrypted.
这些选择中的任何一个都不会错。 为了进行测试，我正在尝试每个驱动器，每个驱动器上一个。 我喜欢TrueCrypt，因为它是开源的，但是我喜欢BitLocker内置于Windows。 我们拭目以待。 重点是，不要把生命放在未加密的磁盘上。
NOTE: Both of these encryption tools take forever (hours) to encrypt the whole disk. Be patient. It'll be a while.
注意：这两种加密工具都需要花费永久(小时)来加密整个磁盘。 耐心一点。 待会儿。
I'm using Acronis Image Home 2011 PC Backup and Recovery for my imaging solution. There are a lot of negative reviews of the 2011 version on Amazon but I haven't had any issues. Be aware. I'm always open to try new products if you have any recommendations, Dear Reader.
我将Acronis Image Home 2011 PC备份和恢复用于我的成像解决方案。 亚马逊上有很多对2011年版本的负面评论，但我没有任何问题。 意识到。 亲爱的读者，如果您有任何建议，我总是愿意尝试新产品。
I use SyncBack to copy files on a schedule through my main machine from my server to the external drive. I could connect the drives directly to the Synology but I want to use my Windows machine for encryption.
我使用SyncBack按计划通过主机将文件从服务器复制到外部驱动器。 我可以将驱动器直接连接到Synology，但是我想使用Windows计算机进行加密。
My wife takes Drive A to the bank's safety deposit box in her monthly visit, then we just swap drives one a month with new backups. I'm not sure if I'll eventually get around to installing CrashPlan on the Synology (I hope it gets easier) but my current offsite "no cloud" backup strategy is working very nicely and it doesn't cost any bandwidth. In fact, I can transfer 1.5TB in just 10 minutes (of driving)!
我的妻子在每月一次的访问中将Drive A带到银行的保险箱中，然后我们每个月将Drive与新的备份交换一次。 我不确定我是否最终会在Synology上安装CrashPlan(我希望它会变得更容易)，但是我当前的异地“无云”备份策略工作得很好，并且不会占用任何带宽。 实际上，我只需开车10分钟就可以传输1.5TB！
* Cloud icon from The Noun Project, CC BY 3.0
*来自CC BY 3.0的Noun Project的云形图标
关于斯科特(About Scott)
Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author.
斯科特·汉塞尔曼(Scott Hanselman)是前教授，前金融首席架构师，现在是演讲者，顾问，父亲，糖尿病患者和Microsoft员工。 他是一位失败的单口相声漫画家，一个玉米种植者和一本书的作者。
翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/a-basic-noncloudbased-personal-backup-strategy
oracle备份及备份策略