如何在一个内核模块中包含三个IRQ处理程序?

问题描述:

我目前在Derek Molloy的书中学习“探索Raspberry Pi - 通过嵌入式Linux与现实世界接口”。我以清单16-3为例,很遗憾,我无法在网上找到它。如何在一个内核模块中包含三个IRQ处理程序?

该示例包含单个中断的内核模块代码。它从GPIO 17的按钮处读取信号,然后发送一个中断以打开GPIO 27的LED。本书使用默认的GPIO引脚编号,因此我也这样做。

我想要做的是修改代码以包含2个其他按钮-LED对。我想这样做是这样的:

  • GPIO 17开启/关闭GPIO 23
  • GPIO 27开启/关闭GPIO 24
  • GPIO 22开启/关闭GPIO 25

这是我使用的修改后的代码。

static unsigned int gpioDevice1 = 17; 
static unsigned int gpioDevice2 = 27; 
static unsigned int gpioDevice3 = 22; 
static unsigned int gpioButton1 = 24; 
static unsigned int gpioButton2 = 23; 
static unsigned int gpioButton3 = 25; 
static unsigned int irqNumber1On; 
static unsigned int irqNumber2On; 
static unsigned int irqNumber3On; 
static unsigned int buttonCounter1 = 0; 
static unsigned int buttonCounter2 = 0; 
static unsigned int buttonCounter3 = 0; 
static unsigned int totalCounter = 0; 
static bool devOn1 = 0; // Initial state of devices 
static bool devOn2 = 0; 
static bool devOn3 = 0; 

// prototype for the custom IRQ handler function, function below. Should I use IRQF_SHARED here? 

static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_1(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs); 
static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_2(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs); 
static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_3(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs); 

/** LKM initialization function */ 

static int __init rpi3_gpio_init(void) { 
    int result1On = 0; 
    int result2On = 0; 
    int result3On = 0; 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: Initializing the GPIO_TEST LKM\n"); 

    /* GPIO validation on the three devices */ 
    if (!gpio_is_valid(gpioDevice1) || !gpio_is_valid(gpioDevice2) || !gpio_is_valid(gpioDevice3)) { 
     printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: invalid GPIO for Devices\n"); 
     return -ENODEV; //wouldn't using ENXIO is more appropriate than ENODEV? 
    } 

    /* Configuring GPIO pins for the pairs */ 
    gpio_request(gpioDevice1, "sysfs"); // request LED GPIO 
    gpio_direction_output(gpioDevice1, devOn1); // set in output mode 
    gpio_export(gpioDevice1, false); // appears in /sys/class/gpio 
    // false prevents in/out change 

    gpio_request(gpioDevice2, "sysfs"); 
    gpio_direction_output(gpioDevice2, devOn2); 
    gpio_export(gpioDevice2, false); 

    gpio_request(gpioDevice3, "sysfs"); 
    gpio_direction_output(gpioDevice3, devOn3); 
    gpio_export(gpioDevice3, false); 

    gpio_request(gpioButton1, "sysfs"); // set up gpioButton1 
    gpio_direction_input(gpioButton1); // set up as input 
    gpio_set_debounce(gpioButton1, 200); // debounce delay of 200ms to avoid erratic and uncontrolled interrupt 
    gpio_export(gpioButton1, false); // appears in /sys/class/gpio 

    gpio_request(gpioButton2, "sysfs"); 
    gpio_direction_input(gpioButton2); 
    gpio_set_debounce(gpioButton2, 200); 
    gpio_export(gpioButton2, false); 

    gpio_request(gpioButton3, "sysfs"); 
    gpio_direction_input(gpioButton3); 
    gpio_set_debounce(gpioButton3, 200); 
    gpio_export(gpioButton3, false); 

    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button1 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton1)); 
    irqNumber1On = gpio_to_irq(gpioButton1); // map GPIO to IRQ number 189? 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button1 mapped to IRQ: %d\n", irqNumber1On); 

    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button2 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton2)); 
    irqNumber2On = gpio_to_irq(gpioButton2); // map GPIO to IRQ number 190? 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button2 mapped to IRQ: %d\n", irqNumber2On); 

    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button3 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton3)); 
    irqNumber3On = gpio_to_irq(gpioButton3); // map GPIO to IRQ number 191? 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button3 mapped to IRQ: %d\n", irqNumber3On); 

    /* Interrupt lines when tactile button is pressed */ 
    result1On = request_irq(irqNumber1On, // interrupt number requested 
      (irq_handler_t) rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_1, // handler function 
      // TO DO: Insert IRQF_SHARED here? 
      IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, // on rising edge (press, not release) 
      "rpi3_gpio_handler", // used in /proc/interrupts 
      NULL); // *dev_id for shared interrupt lines shouldn't be NULL 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: IRQ request result for device 1 is: %d\n", result1On); 
    return result1On; 

    result2On = request_irq(irqNumber2On, 
      (irq_handler_t) rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_2, 
      IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, 
      "rpi3_gpio_handler", 
      NULL); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: IRQ request result for device 2 is: %d\n", result2On); 
    return result2On; 

    result3On = request_irq(irqNumber3On, 
      (irq_handler_t) rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_3, 
      IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, 
      "rpi3_gpio_handler", 
      NULL); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: IRQ request result for device 3 is: %d\n", result3On); 
    return result3On; 
} 

static void __exit rpi3_gpio_exit(void) { 

    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 1 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton1)); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 1 was pressed %d times\n", buttonCounter1); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 2 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton2)); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 2 was pressed %d times\n", buttonCounter2); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 3 value is currently: %d\n", gpio_get_value(gpioButton3)); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: button 3 was pressed %d times\n", buttonCounter3); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: in total the buttons was pressed %d times\n", totalCounter); 

    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice1, 0); // turn the LED off 
    gpio_unexport(gpioDevice1); // unexport the LED GPIO 
    free_irq(irqNumber1On, NULL); // free the IRQ number, no *dev_id? 
    gpio_unexport(gpioButton1); // unexport the Button GPIO 
    gpio_free(gpioDevice1); // free the LED GPIO 
    gpio_free(gpioButton1); // free the Button GPIO 

    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice2, 0); 
    gpio_unexport(gpioDevice2); 
    free_irq(irqNumber2On, NULL); 
    gpio_unexport(gpioButton2); 
    gpio_free(gpioDevice2); 
    gpio_free(gpioButton2); 

    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice3, 0); 
    gpio_unexport(gpioDevice3); 
    free_irq(irqNumber3On, NULL); 
    gpio_unexport(gpioButton3); 
    gpio_free(gpioDevice3); 
    gpio_free(gpioButton3); 

    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: Goodbye from the LKM!\n"); 
} 

/** GPIO IRQ Handler functions */ 

static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_1(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) { 
    devOn1 = !devOn1; // invert the LED state 
    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice1, devOn1); // set LED accordingly 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: Interrupt! (button 1 is %d)\n", 
    gpio_get_value(gpioButton1)); 
    buttonCounter1++; 
    totalCounter++; // global counter 
    return (irq_handler_t) IRQ_HANDLED; // announce IRQ handled 
} 

static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_2(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) { 
    devOn2 = !devOn2; 
    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice2, devOn2); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: Interrupt! (button 2 is %d)\n", 
    gpio_get_value(gpioButton2)); 
    buttonCounter2++; 
    totalCounter++; 
    return (irq_handler_t) IRQ_HANDLED; 
} 

static irq_handler_t rpi3_gpio_irq_handler_3(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) { 
    devOn3 = !devOn3; 
    gpio_set_value(gpioDevice3, devOn3); 
    printk(KERN_INFO "GPIO_TEST: Interrupt! (button 3 is %d)\n", 
    gpio_get_value(gpioButton3)); 
    buttonCounter3++; 
    totalCounter++; 
    return (irq_handler_t) IRQ_HANDLED; 
} 

module_init(rpi3_gpio_init); 
module_exit(rpi3_gpio_exit); 

要获得我的例子中使用gpio_to_irq()像IRQ号,因为我不知道什么样的价值观将是一个有效的数字。

第一对运行良好,但其他对不会工作,无论我按了多少次按钮。当我与cat /proc/interruptsI got this display in the terminal. I've inverted the colors to make it easier to skim through

检查IRQ号似乎只有第一个得到一个IRQ号,它是。假设,其他两个可能应该得到和,但他们不在那里。

printk()函数也只显示行irqnumber1On,而行irqnumber2Onirqnumber3On没有出现。

我给了中断NULL dev_id,因为我不知道如何给/读ID按钮。我尝试了随机数组合,如,和但终端表示warning: passing argument 5 of 'request_irq' makes pointer from integer without a cast

那么,我在这里犯了什么严重错误?我坚持了这一段时间。我应该尝试使用IRQF_SHARED吗?但是对于每个中断(或在这种情况下的按钮),它都需要特定的dev_id。我的新手头脑认为这是不可能的。

PS:我知道代码看起来凌乱和可怕,但请耐心等待。

PPS:如果认为有必要,我可以删除部分代码。

本声明之后的任何代码:

return result1On; 

将永远不会被执行。

这意味着其他两个按钮中断将永远不会被处理

+0

糟糕,我错过了这一点。我会尝试使用一个结构。尝试后我会回来的。 –